Ambient Lighting Blush Sublime Flush dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.5 (2,379)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A nude pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
52
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Closer, against Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in Sublime Flush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSublime FlushClosest shade matchCloserHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%81#eeaebc#fdacb8Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared55
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format25%—not comparableNot listedPowderNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 73/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Givenchy Prisme Libre Loose Powder Long-Wearing Radiant Blush in 2 - Taffetas Rosé, against Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in Sublime Flush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSublime FlushClosest overall alternative2 - Taffetas RoséHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%77#eeaebc#f1a1aeClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparableNot listedPowderNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$21 less (44%)
