Illusion Luminous Glow Foundation SPF 30 23 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.7 (820)·Deep · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
$56Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (7%)4.3 (618)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
$41Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (32%)4.5 (2,588)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
The closest shade to Hourglass Illusion Luminous Glow Foundation SPF 30 23 (Deep · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Smashbox Always On Skin-Balancing Foundation in D20W, against Hourglass Illusion Luminous Glow Foundation SPF 30 in 23. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade23Closest shade matchD20WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%94#84542b#88542dVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 84/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 330 Accra, against Hourglass Illusion Luminous Glow Foundation SPF 30 in 23. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade23Closest overall alternative330 AccraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%94#84542b#8a5528Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.