Unreal Liquid Blush Future dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.6 (1,395)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Apricot rather than coral· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (5%)4.3 (1,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (29%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
90
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than coral· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Saie SuperSuede Radiant Talc-Free Baked Powder Blush in Stella, against Hourglass Unreal Liquid Blush in Future. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFutureClosest shade matchStellaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#db524a#d14e49Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared51
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Pulse, against Hourglass Unreal Liquid Blush in Future. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFutureClosest overall alternativePulseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#db524a#e25b4fVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.