Unreal Liquid Blush Vision dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.6 (1,395)·Rose · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
51
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Apricot rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Apricot rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (11%)4.8 (818)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (11%)4.8 (818)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
52
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Looks identical · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in French Rosette, against Hourglass Unreal Liquid Blush in Vision. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVisionClosest shade matchFrench RosetteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#d96461#d36b66Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Cheeky Lychee, against Hourglass Unreal Liquid Blush in Vision. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVisionClosest overall alternativeCheeky LycheeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%97#d96461#dd605eLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.