Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Sepia 5 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Light medium · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium to medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (59%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (59%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (21%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for light warm skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light to medium with a golden undertone
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm olive undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (59%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm peach undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Sepia 5 (Light medium · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 3N Neutral, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Sepia 5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSepia 5Closest shade match3N NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#d9a97b#d7ab86Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared47
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, combinationNormalBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 23.5 Medium Amber, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Sepia 5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSepia 5Closest overall alternative23.5 Medium AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%95#d9a97b#d6a476Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
View at Target