Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Silk 2.5 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Light medium · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with cool, pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: light+ with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with cool pink undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L3 - light to medium with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.5 - light with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: L3 - Light to medium with cool undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Silk 2.5 (Light medium · Cool · pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 1CR Cool Rosy, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Silk 2.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSilk 2.5Closest shade match1CR Cool RosyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#dcb39d#d8b39cVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared47
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, combinationNormalBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer in Taffy, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Silk 2.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSilk 2.5Closest overall alternativeTaffyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#dcb39d#e4baa2Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.