Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush Magnetic dupes and alternatives ILIA
4.8 (1,367)·Berry · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: powder
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration· Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
97
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than berry· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than berry · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (69%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
97
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Moone, against ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Magnetic. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMagneticClosest shade matchMooneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%78#a53f55#98444dClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall86
Finish50%89NaturalSatinCloseSatin finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall85
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Baked Blush in Ciao Bella, against ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Magnetic. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMagneticClosest overall alternativeCiao BellaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%83#a53f55#984857Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.