Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush Wonder dupes and alternatives ILIA
4.8 (1,367)·Terracotta · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Red Brown Rosy Bronze Bliush Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep rose bronze with shimmer
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (25%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
90
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a brick red combined with radiant light to recreate a vibrant fireside gleam
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (25%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
90
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Coral rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Coral rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
90
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
90
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than terracotta· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
66
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep burnt rose (dream blur matte)
CoverGirl Trublend Skin Enhancer Balm Blush Stick in Toasted Chai, against ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Wonder. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWonderClosest shade matchToasted ChaiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%75#974443#924a3eClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall59
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 72/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Daily Calm Lip + Cheek Color in Tender Heart, against ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Wonder. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWonderClosest overall alternativeTender HeartHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%76#974443#86403aClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 5.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, Combination, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $4 more
