Best Skin Days SPF30 Whipped Skin Tint 12 dupes and alternatives Iris&Romeo
4.0 (351)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Ultra Rich skin with golden-red undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (21%)4.1 (2,064)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims 48-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for extra deep neutral skin with a peach hue
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich with warm red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deepest with cool rose undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Iris&Romeo Best Skin Days SPF30 Whipped Skin Tint 12 (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Amazonian Clay Blurring Powder Foundation in 58H rich honey, against Iris&Romeo Best Skin Days SPF30 Whipped Skin Tint in 12. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade12Closest shade match58H rich honeyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#6d3e27#6b3b25Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Dry, combination, sensitiveNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 72/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 58S Rich Sand, against Iris&Romeo Best Skin Days SPF30 Whipped Skin Tint in 12. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade12Closest overall alternative58S Rich SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#6d3e27#6f4127Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $14 more
Sephora
