CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation Medium Tan dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
3.9 (592)·Fair · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M1.2 - Medium with neutral undertones and a light peach tone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M1.5 - medium with cool undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very light neutral skin with peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as medium
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (31%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as fair, yours as medium · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Fair with Neutral Undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as fair, yours as medium
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation Medium Tan (Fair · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
CoverGirl Olay Simply Ageless Instant Wrinkle-Defying Foundation with SPF 28 in Warm Beige, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation in Medium Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium TanClosest shade matchWarm BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#f3c39d#f0c49dLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 82/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Treatment Foundation in 120, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation in Medium Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium TanClosest overall alternative120How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%93#f3c39d#fbc9a5Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94FairFairSameDepth difference: 3.4
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared93
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared74
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Sephora$3 less (7%)
Target
