PurePressed Blush Cotton Candy dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.7 (1,577)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A nude pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Benefit Cosmetics Dandelion Baby-Pink Brightening Blush in Full Size, against Jane Iredale PurePressed Blush in Cotton Candy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCotton CandyClosest shade matchFull SizeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%79#f5bcb0#f3b1abClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall79
Finish50%58ShimmerSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than shimmer
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Orgasm – 777, against Jane Iredale PurePressed Blush in Cotton Candy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCotton CandyClosest overall alternativeOrgasm – 777How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%71#f5bcb0#f7aea8Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 85/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.