PurePressed Blush Velvet Petal dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.7 (1,577)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft peach (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than peach· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than peach · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than peach· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than peach · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Charlotte Tilbury Matte Beauty Blush Wand in Pillow Talk Peach Pop, against Jane Iredale PurePressed Blush in Velvet Petal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVelvet PetalClosest shade matchPillow Talk Peach PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#e88d7b#f28972Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder Flushed - Matte Color for Cheek & Lip in Bellini, against Jane Iredale PurePressed Blush in Velvet Petal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVelvet PetalClosest overall alternativeBelliniHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%88#e88d7b#f6907fVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$2 less (6%)
