Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 26 Light dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Light medium · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 26 Light (Light medium · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
SUBTL. Beauty Stackable BB Powder Foundation Single in Light 1C, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 26 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade26 LightClosest shade matchLight 1CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#e4ae88#e1ab85Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 4 Fair, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 26 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade26 LightClosest overall alternative4 FairHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%95#e4ae88#ebb087Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 88/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.