Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 34 Light Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Medium light · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light medium with cool undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (55%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light-medium with cool undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$40 less (71%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
$48Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (14%)4.7 (6,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light skintones with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: light neutral skin with peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with neutral warm undertones
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$36 less (64%)3.7 (146)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$37.01 less (66%)4.2 (18,317)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light medium skintones with warm golden undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (57%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: neutral light medium with peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 34 Light Medium (Medium light · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 266C, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 34 Light Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade34 Light MediumClosest shade match266CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d09d7e#ce9d7cLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Dual Filter 2-In-1 Longwearing Concealer + Foundation in Light Medium 15 Cool, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 34 Light Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade34 Light MediumClosest overall alternativeLight Medium 15 CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#d09d7e#d4a184Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.