Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (39%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than blue · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Black rather than purple· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Black rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Green rather than blue· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than blue · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: electric purple teal with green blue shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
8
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than blue · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: blackened purple with multicoloured pearls
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Peekablue Matte, against Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu. Compared using pan 2 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlueberry BingsuClosest shade matchPeekablue MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#8ea6c8#849fc2Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Tailored Denim, against Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu. Compared using pan 2 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlueberry BingsuClosest overall alternativeTailored DenimHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#8ea6c8#89aaceVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$17 less (61%)
Walmart
