Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Ablaze, against Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Champagne Sequin. Compared using pan 3 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChampagne SequinClosest shade matchAblazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#e6c3a6#e4bfa2Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Sona Sona, against Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Champagne Sequin. Compared using pan 3 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChampagne SequinClosest overall alternativeSona SonaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#e6c3a6#e9c4acVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 92/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.