Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matched on pan 1, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
77
overall
Shade match96
$28SephoraCosts $6 more4.5 (1,880)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matched on pan 1, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
77
overall
Shade match95
$42SephoraCosts $20 more4.0 (616)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Compared using the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
76
overall
Shade match91
$26Ulta BeautyCosts $4 more4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Compared using the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
74
overall
Shade match86
$26Ulta BeautyCosts $4 more4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Claims crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matched on pan 3, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
72
overall
Shade match87
$12Ulta Beauty$10 less (45%)4.4 (408)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Compared using the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
72
overall
Shade match79
$19Ulta Beauty$3 less (14%)4.9 (122)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Compared using the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
71
overall
Shade match79
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (32%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Creme Brulee, against Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Peach Sprinkle. Matched on pan 1, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeach SprinkleClosest shade matchCreme BruleeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#f3c8b7#f0c5b5Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared7
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 62/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Idôle Goddess Dimension Eyeshadow in 09 Stellar Light, against Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Peach Sprinkle. Compared using the deeper eyeshadow pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeach SprinkleClosest overall alternative09 Stellar LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#efb9b5#f4bfbbLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$15 less (68%)
Sephora
