Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Hourglass Phantom Volumizing Glossy Lip Balm in Sense 110, against Kosas Wet Lip Oil Plumping Peptide Lip Treatment Gloss in Dip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDipClosest shade matchSense 110How they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall89
Colour55%92#da7762#d77c6bVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%75PearlShimmerSome differenceShimmer rather than pearl
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Pat McGrath Labs Lust: Gloss in Bronze Venus, against Kosas Wet Lip Oil Plumping Peptide Lip Treatment Gloss in Dip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDipClosest overall alternativeBronze VenusHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall79
Colour55%86#da7762#dc816fVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 82/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $17 more
