Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Same transparency: tinted· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · High shine
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same shine: high shine· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · High shine · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
CoverGirl Clean Fresh Yummy Lip Gloss in 880 Merry Kissmass, against Kosas Wet Lip Oil Plumping Peptide Lip Treatment Gloss in Slushy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSlushyClosest shade match880 Merry KissmassHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall93
Colour55%89#c70a0b#d2100fVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Shine40%—not comparableHigh shineNot listedNot listed for eitherA shine level not listed for one product
Transparency35%—not comparableTintedNot listedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall100
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Overall match 77/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme Plumping Clicks in On Pointe, against Kosas Wet Lip Oil Plumping Peptide Lip Treatment Gloss in Slushy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSlushyClosest overall alternativeOn PointeHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall88
Colour55%79#c70a0b#c31f22Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Overall match 84/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
SephoraCosts $18 more
Ulta Beauty
