Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation 8W dupes and alternatives Kylie Cosmetics
4.5 (1,573)·Deep tan · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium-to-tan shade with warm undertones
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (60%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
76
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep-Tan skin with a neutral-red undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
43
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 37% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Tan with strong golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Tan with strong golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: TAN TO DARK WARM OLIVE UNDERTONES
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (66%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
43
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (37%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
76
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation 8W (Deep tan · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Urban Decay Face Bond Self Setting Waterproof Foundation in 30, against Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 8W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8WClosest shade match30How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#9c623d#9e633dLooks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Combination, normalNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for combination/normal skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Refy Skin Base Hydrating Gel Skin Tint in 230 W, against Kylie Cosmetics Skin Tint Blurring Elixir Foundation in 8W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8WClosest overall alternative230 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#9c623d#996443Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Combination, normalNormal, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for combination/normal skin
Overall match 90/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $25 more
