Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 160 Ivoire W dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.3 (1,911)·Light medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: intense medium shade, neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/normal skin
Retailer shade note: tan complexion with warm golden undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with neutral undertones
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with warm peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: ivory beige - light medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light brown shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Lancôme Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 160 Ivoire W (Light medium) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
PÜR 4-in-1 Pressed Mineral Makeup SPF 15 in Blush Medium MP3, against Lancôme Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 in 160 Ivoire W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade160 Ivoire WClosest shade matchBlush Medium MP3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%100#d5ac90#d5ac90Looks identicalColour difference 0.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 77/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Tan Rich, against Lancôme Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 in 160 Ivoire W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade160 Ivoire WClosest overall alternativeTan RichHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%96#d5ac90#d4ac8dLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $18 more
