Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 360 Dore 20 W dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.3 (1,911)·Medium tan
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish· Light rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Radiant rather than luminous finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$55 less (87%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: MD3 - Medium-deep with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-deep with olive undertones
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$56.01 less (89%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
37
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Lancôme Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 360 Dore 20 W (Medium tan) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Gucci 24 Hour Full Coverage Luminous Matte Finish Foundation in 310N, against Lancôme Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 in 360 Dore 20 W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade360 Dore 20 WClosest shade match310NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%99#c48a63#c38961Looks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in C4, against Lancôme Rénergie Lift Makeup Lightweight Liquid Foundation SPF 27 in 360 Dore 20 W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade360 Dore 20 WClosest overall alternativeC4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%98#c48a63#c78b63Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.