Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer Medium dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.8 (407)·Golden · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with warm, slightly neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral, slightly golden undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm copper undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with warm, neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Claims waterproof· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Patrick Ta Major Sculpt Crème Contour & Powder Bronzer Duo in She's Bronzed, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Medium. Matched on the bronzer pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMediumClosest shade matchShe's BronzedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour55%69#cf6e4f#cf7e59Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth25%88MediumLightCloseDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 74/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent All Hours 24H Hyper Sunkissed Glow Bronzer Powder in 4, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMediumClosest overall alternative4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour55%62#cf6e4f#c87b51Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.0 (0 is identical)
Depth25%95MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall89
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.