Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer Tan dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.8 (407)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: light medium with golden undertones
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration· Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: fair light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with warm bronzer and warm contour
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light to light-medium with a golden undertone
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 39% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm copper undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-medium bronze with warm undertones
Dior Forever Skin Bronze in 01, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTanClosest shade match01How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#da8667#d6835eVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall73
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Overall match 85/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Warm Wishes Soft Matte Powder Bronzer in Summer Feels, against Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTanClosest overall alternativeSummer FeelsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%76#da8667#d48d67Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.