Infallible Cushion Foundation 410 Cool dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.3 (275)·Very deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with cool red undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with brick red undertones
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Rich skin with a red undertone
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with true red undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral to golden undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.99 less (20%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: dark skin with neutral beige undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.99 less (60%)2.4 (5)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: dark or deep skin tones with red undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation 410 Cool (Very deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Waterproof Foundation in 6C1 Mink, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation in 410 Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 CoolClosest shade match6C1 MinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#843118#84351fLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Complexion Crush Foundation in Dark Cool, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Cushion Foundation in 410 Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 CoolClosest overall alternativeDark CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%78#843118#7a3717Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $26.91 more
