Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation 511 Maple dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.4 (40,035)·Tan
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.99 less (58%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Deep-Tan skin with a golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: MD4 - medium-deep to deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
33
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
36
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation 511 Maple (Tan) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Tan 200 N, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation in 511 Maple. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade511 MapleClosest shade matchTan 200 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%99#b2723f#b1723eLooks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionNot statedTanNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 82/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Best Skin Ever Liquid Foundation in 29N, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible 32H Fresh Wear Foundation in 511 Maple. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade511 MapleClosest overall alternative29NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%95#b2723f#b07042Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionNot statedTanNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $5.01 more
