True Match Radiant Serum Concealer N1 dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.4 (832)·Very fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very light with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
22
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for light skin w/ warm olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
68
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral yellow undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: ultra light with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
22
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin w/ warm yellow undertones
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris True Match Radiant Serum Concealer N1 (Very fair · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Chantilly, against L'Oréal Paris True Match Radiant Serum Concealer in N1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeN1Closest shade matchChantillyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#ffefd6#f8e3cbClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared26
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedMediumNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, combination, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 67/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 100W, against L'Oréal Paris True Match Radiant Serum Concealer in N1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeN1Closest overall alternative100WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%83#ffefd6#f7e3ccClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedMediumNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveOily, dry, combination, normalMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 85/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $7.01 more
