Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick Gem Stone dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (966)·Brown · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Original Satin Lipstick in Organza, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick in Gem Stone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGem StoneClosest matchOrganzaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%87#a36964#ac6561Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.