Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick Mauve Matter dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (966)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Glossy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Glossy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Orange rather than mauve· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Orange rather than mauve · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (54%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than mauve · Glossy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Cream rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Cream · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Cream rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Glossy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Cinnamon Dreamz, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick in Mauve Matter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMauve MatterClosest shade matchCinnamon DreamzHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall77
Colour60%95#7b2f1b#782a15Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 64/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Can't Dull My Shine, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick in Mauve Matter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMauve MatterClosest overall alternativeCan't Dull My ShineHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall73
Colour60%88#7b2f1b#76270fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Finish55%70ShimmerGlossySome differenceGlossy finish rather than shimmer
Opacity45%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 66/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.