Glow Play Cushiony Blush Blush, Please dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,232)·Mauve · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: bronze, copper, and pink for darker skin tones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
52
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
71
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: nude pink / light to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 110A - Into The Nude, against MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Blush, Please. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlush, PleaseClosest shade match110A - Into The NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%87#c27968#c4796fVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall54
Finish50%45DewyMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Convertible Color Lip & Cheek Cream Blush in Peony, against MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Blush, Please. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlush, PleaseClosest overall alternativePeonyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%92#c27968#c57466Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 75/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.