Glow Play Cushiony Blush Totally Synced dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,232)·Mauve · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: cream
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Natasha Denona Hy-Blush Cloudy Cream Cheek Duo in Lush Lila, against MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Totally Synced. Matched on the lighter blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTotally SyncedClosest matchLush LilaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#d691a3#e197aeVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.