Lipglass High Shine Lip Gloss Oh Baby dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,726)·Brown · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Claims non-sticky
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Sparkle rather than glitter (shimmer)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Sparkle rather than glitter (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Claims non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Holographic rather than glitter (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Holographic rather than glitter (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Claims non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (shimmer)
Anastasia Beverly Hills Universal Luminous Tinted Lip Gloss in Deep Taupe, against MAC Cosmetics Lipglass High Shine Lip Gloss in Oh Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOh BabyClosest shade matchDeep TaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall87
Colour55%78#d08a69#da8f76Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78ShimmerHigh shineCloseMore shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableGlitterNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall40
Non-sticky50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a non-sticky feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 73/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Keep It Full Nourishing Lip Plumper in Nude Shimmer, against MAC Cosmetics Lipglass High Shine Lip Gloss in Oh Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOh BabyClosest overall alternativeNude ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall81
Colour55%70#d08a69#d59b7eClose colourColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%81LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%75GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer rather than glitter
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a non-sticky feel; your product does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $18 more
