Matte Eyeshadow Honey Lust dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.50 less (60%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than peach· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than peach · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: peachy beige with champagne sparkle
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer gold with multi-color sparkle
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 8-hour wear· Claims comfort
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Starlight, against MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Honey Lust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoney LustClosest shade matchStarlightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#cdac9d#cba8a1Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Sorbetto, against MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Honey Lust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoney LustClosest overall alternativeSorbettoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%89#cdac9d#cca594Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.