Matte Eyeshadow Yogurt dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling rose gold with a duo-chrome bluish-green shift
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (35%)4.2 (339)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 70M Sakura, against MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Yogurt. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeYogurtClosest shade match70M SakuraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#f0c8cd#eccbd0Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall19
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared75
Longevity50%608-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Overall match 68/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe ChromaPlus Eyeshadow Trio in Tulle Order, against MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Yogurt. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeYogurtClosest overall alternativeTulle OrderHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#f0c8cd#fdcccaClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$19 less (73%)
