Satin Eyeshadow Brulé dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (46%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
bareMinerals GEN NUDE Liquid Mineral Eyeshadow in Sandstone, against MAC Cosmetics Satin Eyeshadow in Brulé. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBruléClosest shade matchSandstoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#f1d1c0#efd4c9Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in Morning Java, against MAC Cosmetics Satin Eyeshadow in Brulé. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBruléClosest overall alternativeMorning JavaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#f1d1c0#f1d4caVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.