Satin Eyeshadow Girlie dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (1,256)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: Cool-toned pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Strawberry Fudge, against MAC Cosmetics Satin Eyeshadow in Girlie. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGirlieClosest matchStrawberry FudgeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#dca7af#dba8adLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 94/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $2 more
