Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow Joie De Glitz dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (163)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (42%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than green· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Terracotta rather than green · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: emerald green to gold to teal
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with a walnut shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than green· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than green· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than green · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in On Safari, against MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Joie De Glitz. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJoie De GlitzClosest matchOn SafariHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%70#9c8834#968a4eClose colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$11 less (42%)
Sephora
