Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow Object D'Art dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (163)·Terracotta · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: maple sparkle, sunset sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (46%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than terracotta· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than terracotta · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Short Stack, against MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Object D'Art. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeObject D'ArtClosest matchShort StackHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#bd6f3e#c56a3fClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Overall match 82/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$1 less (4%)
