Small Shadeshift Chrome Eyeshadow Ethereal dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (351)·Purple · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: deep purple shimmer with blue shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Black rather than purple
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Black rather than purple · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: deep navy with multicolored pearls
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than purple · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling sapphire blue with duo-chrome reflects
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic eggplant with navy flecks
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than purple · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Black rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Black rather than purple · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling purple black with pink reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
22
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu, against MAC Cosmetics Small Shadeshift Chrome Eyeshadow in Ethereal. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEtherealClosest shade matchBlueberry BingsuHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%80#4e5070#555974Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared11
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 58/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Dual-Ended Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Silk / Rich Navy, against MAC Cosmetics Small Shadeshift Chrome Eyeshadow in Ethereal. Matched on the Rich Navy pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEtherealClosest overall alternativeSilk / Rich NavyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%82#4e5070#4a4d78Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$15 less (54%)
