Small Shadeshift Chrome Eyeshadow Venom dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (351)·Terracotta · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Copper rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Copper rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Couture Copper, against MAC Cosmetics Small Shadeshift Chrome Eyeshadow in Venom. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVenomClosest matchCouture CopperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%98#b65d40#b65c3dLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 85/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$15 less (54%)
Sephora
