SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation 14O dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.0 (3,150)·Medium tan · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium shade with neutral-to-warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium light-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Medium to Dark, neutral cool undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (48%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertone
The closest shade to Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation 14O (Medium tan · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 376N, against Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation in 14O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14OClosest match376NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#b6825a#b78660Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $12 more
