SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation 30W dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.0 (3,150)·Rich deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Deep to rich neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deep shade with neutral-to-warm undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$30.01 less (63%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$30.01 less (63%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with warm-neutral undertones
The closest shade to Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation 30W (Rich deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Urban Decay Face Bond Self Setting Waterproof Foundation in 39, against Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation in 30W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade30WClosest shade match39How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#472b1f#4b2e24Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared74
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 498, against Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation in 30W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade30WClosest overall alternative498How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%98#472b1f#45291dLooks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared63
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $2 more
