Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint Skinnydip dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.1 (18,785)·Nude · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same opacity: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: pinky brown with a matte finish
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: midtone mauvy pink with a matte finish
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: taupey pink nude with silver pearl
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Teddy 2.0, against Maybelline Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint in Skinnydip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSkinnydipClosest matchTeddy 2.0How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#d16d63#c97068Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%9012-hour wear10-hour wearClose10-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 93/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.