Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint Wild at Heart dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.1 (18,785)·Red · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Ruby Woo, against Maybelline Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint in Wild at Heart. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWild at HeartClosest shade matchRuby WooHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%94#881d2c#8b252fVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall84
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 94 Cherry Moon, against Maybelline Super Stay Teddy Tint Long Lasting Matte Lip Tint in Wild at Heart. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWild at HeartClosest overall alternative94 Cherry MoonHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%92#881d2c#7e1d28Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall84
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall94
Longevity60%9012-hour wear10-hour wearClose10-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.99 less (15%)
