Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks Canyon dupes and alternatives Milani
4.3 (981)·Brown · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.99 less (50%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Berry rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.99 less (25%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than brown · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than brown· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than brown · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Sparkling Maple, against Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Canyon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCanyonClosest shade matchSparkling MapleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#7a4a48#774a45Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Overall match 88/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $22.01 more
