Laguna Bronzer Powder Talc-Free Laguna 01 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.6 (1,613)·Bronze · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: fair light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a medium bronze shade fused with Luminous Light for a softer, candlelit warmth. (Ideal for light/medium complexions)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for fair to light skin tones
Anastasia Beverly Hills Matte Contour and Sculpt Cream Bronzer in Sun Kissed, against NARS Laguna Bronzer Powder Talc-Free in Laguna 01. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLaguna 01Closest shade matchSun KissedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%96#c68f6d#c98d69Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 77/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique True Bronze Pressed Powder Bronzer in Sunkissed, against NARS Laguna Bronzer Powder Talc-Free in Laguna 01. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLaguna 01Closest overall alternativeSunkissedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%92#c68f6d#cb8c69Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared60
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%20Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormalDifferentBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $18 more
