Laguna Bronzer Powder Talc-Free Laguna 04 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.6 (1,613)·Bronze · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: very tan deep with neutral bronze undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with a neutral golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: tan to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for dark skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Dior Forever Nude Bronze in 30 Tan Matte, against NARS Laguna Bronzer Powder Talc-Free in Laguna 04. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLaguna 04Closest shade match30 Tan MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%99#a06852#a06953Looks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Refill Tan, against NARS Laguna Bronzer Powder Talc-Free in Laguna 04. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLaguna 04Closest overall alternativeRefill TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%96#a06852#9d6a54Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 91/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $21 more
