Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation P8 dupes and alternatives Natasha Denona
4.5 (2,944)·Tan · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· No drying alcohol listed· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (6%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.01 less (63%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
36
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$36 less (69%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Same radiant finish· No drying alcohol listed· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
The closest shade to Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation P8 (Tan · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 12 Tan, against Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in P8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP8Closest shade match12 TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%83#c96f2f#bc7237Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionDeepDeep tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%60MediumLightSome differenceLight coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7018-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 18-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 520 Tangier, against Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in P8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeP8Closest overall alternative520 TangierHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%75#c96f2f#be7846Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 80/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$24 less (46%)
