Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (48%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
NYX Professional Makeup Lid Lingerie Cream Eye Pigment in In-Nude-Endo, against Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Nude. Compared using the Atik pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNudeClosest shade matchIn-Nude-EndoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#e5a389#e8a186Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Still At The Club, against Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Nude. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan, against the Shea pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNudeClosest overall alternativeStill At The ClubHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#693f35#70433aVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Overall match 90/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$6 less (13%)
