Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan, against the Affinity pan of your shade
74
overall
Shade match82
$43Sephora$5 less (10%)4.8 (1,679)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Nude Mood, against Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Rosy. Matched on pan 4, against the Shell pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRosyClosest shade matchNude MoodHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#cc998d#c8988aLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall48
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Overall match 75/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Rosé + Truffles, against Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Rosy. Compared using the Shell pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRosyClosest overall alternativeRosé + TrufflesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#cc998d#d19787Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall90
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.